Yes. It works without lualibs-os
Thanks
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
On 8/14/2023 9:13 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
It does not work:
\directlua{
34require "lualibs-os"
35 >> tex.sprint(math.floor(os.resultof("git log --pretty=oneline | wc
-l")+1))}
What do you run directlua in LMTX?
in this case, what does does lualibs-os provide? os.resultof is built
It does not work:
\directlua{
34require "lualibs-os"
35 >> tex.sprint(math.floor(os.resultof("git log --pretty=oneline | wc
-l")+1))}
What do you run directlua in LMTX?
___
If your question is of
On 8/13/2023 10:39 PM, Xavier B. wrote:
Running LMTX I have an error: lualibs-os not found:
lua error > lua error on line 35 in file
ng-pre-informacio-document.conTeXt:
token call, execute:
...nt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module
'lualibs-os' not found:
Running LMTX I have an error: lualibs-os not found:
lua error > lua error on line 35 in file
ng-pre-informacio-document.conTeXt:
token call, execute:
...nt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module
'lualibs-os' not found:
no field
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 9:13 AM Xavier B. wrote:
>
> So,
>
> Finally is it a bug in MKIV? It seems you fix some kind of bug in your
> messages. Is it true?
>
> > The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar
> > (and different linebreaking).
> >
> >
On 8/13/2023 9:08 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
So,
Finally is it a bug in MKIV? It seems you fix some kind of bug in your
messages. Is it true?
Not really. It's a a bug in the fonts (that will stay if only for
compaibility reasons). There is a catch in mkiv that compensates for it
but only when
So,
Finally is it a bug in MKIV? It seems you fix some kind of bug in your
messages. Is it true?
> The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar
> (and different linebreaking).
>
> \showglyphs
>
> \startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
> \ruledhbox{$\overline{OA}
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
if you want nicer math switch over to lmtx as mkiv is sort of frozen and
efforts wrt math go into lmtx
Hans
On 8/12/2023 11:46 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 12.08.2023 um 11:13:
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
Looks ok here (see atached). Does the
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 12.08.2023 um 11:13:
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
Looks ok here (see atached). Does the modern-math.lfg file have:
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
Looks ok here (see atached). Does the modern-math.lfg file have:
AccentTopShiftUp = -60,
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
Xavier
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:38:00 +0200
"Xavier B." ha escrit:
> If you run
>
> \starttext
>
> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod
> tempor
Looks fine to me.
Current version: 2023.08.10 02:59
Running on Linux.
What fonts are you using?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:38 PM Xavier B. wrote:
> If you run
>
> \starttext
>
> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod
> tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore
If you run
\starttext
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor
incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit
Am 2017-09-10 um 11:09 schrieb Herbert Voss :
> Am 10.09.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
>> My current code actually looks like
>> % split in #1 page size parts
>> \def\clipfigure{\dodoubleempty\doClipFigure}
>> \def\doClipFigure[#1][#2]{
>> \ifsecondargument
Am 10.09.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
My current code actually looks like
% split in #1 page size parts
\def\clipfigure{\dodoubleempty\doClipFigure}
\def\doClipFigure[#1][#2]{
\ifsecondargument
\dorecurse{#1}{%
\tooltip{\clip[
height=\textheight,
Am 10.09.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm:
\def\ausschnitt{\dodoubleempty\doAusschnitt}
\def\doAusschnitt#1#2{\clip[height=\textheight,voffset=#1]{\externalfigure[#2][width=\textwidth]}\par}
This also doesn’t work; there I’m trying to set the y coordinate for the start
like
Am 2017-09-09 um 22:06 schrieb Aditya Mahajan :
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>
>> Ahoi,
>> I got some long images that I’d like to split over several pages.
>>
>> \def\clipfigure{\dodoubleempty\doClipFigure}
>> \def\doClipFigure[#1][#2]{
>>
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Ahoi,
I got some long images that I’d like to split over several pages.
\def\clipfigure{\dodoubleempty\doClipFigure}
\def\doClipFigure[#1][#2]{
\dorecurse{#1}{%
\clip[
height=\textheight,
voffset=\dimexpr((\recurselevel -1) *
Ahoi,
I got some long images that I’d like to split over several pages.
\def\clipfigure{\dodoubleempty\doClipFigure}
\def\doClipFigure[#1][#2]{
\dorecurse{#1}{%
\clip[
height=\textheight,
voffset=\dimexpr((\recurselevel -1) * \textheight)
On 4/11/2017 4:17 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:02:38 +0200
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Hm, at the meeting it looked like we should/could now use xtables for
everything? Did I misunderstand you, Hans, that xtables can replace
all the other kinds of tables?
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:02:38 +0200
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hm, at the meeting it looked like we should/could now use xtables for
> everything? Did I misunderstand you, Hans, that xtables can replace
> all the other kinds of tables?
Perhaps this is a bug that could be
On 11.04.2017 11:53, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hans, just in case it's useful: I have a small test file that shows my
problem with linetables. The data comes from xml (of course...), but I
have simply captured it in a lua table (in alphabet.lua). Look at p. 4,
10, 11, etc.
All best
Thomas
On 10.04.2017 17:07, Hans Hagen wrote:
don't set it then (line tables are actually able to span pages
horizontally)
Hans, just in case it's useful: I have a small test file that shows my
problem with linetables. The data comes from xml (of course...), but I
have simply captured it in a lua
Am 2017-04-09 um 16:53 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz :
> On 04/09/2017 03:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> \starttext
>>
>> \setuplinetable[n=2,lines=25]
>> \setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
>> ,background=color,backgroundcolor=red,color=white]
>>
On 10.04.2017 17:07, Hans Hagen wrote:
don't set it then (line tables are actually able to span pages
horizontally)
nope, when I don't set it, I don't get a table typeset...
hm, currently not, but i can probably add some features
would be awesome, if you have the time!
Thomas
On 4/10/2017 4:25 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 09.04.2017 15:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttext
\setuplinetable[n=2,lines=25]
\setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
,background=color,backgroundcolor=red,color=white]
\setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
On 09.04.2017 15:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttext
\setuplinetable[n=2,lines=25]
\setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
,background=color,backgroundcolor=red,color=white]
\setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
,background=color,backgroundcolor=red,color=white]
On 04/09/2017 03:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttext
\setuplinetable[n=2,lines=25]
\setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
,background=color,backgroundcolor=red,color=white]
\setuplinetable[c][1][width=6cm] %
,background=color,backgroundcolor=red,color=white]
On 4/9/2017 1:20 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
I need some fundamental advice from experienced users: I'm processing
xml and collecting the data in lua tables, which I want to typeset in
some sort of table or tabular format. Typesetting requirements are
fairly low, just a couple of
Hi all,
I need some fundamental advice from experienced users: I'm processing
xml and collecting the data in lua tables, which I want to typeset in
some sort of table or tabular format. Typesetting requirements are
fairly low, just a couple of columns that need to be nicely aligned,
with the
On 3/24/2016 8:58 AM, Peter Münster wrote:
Hi,
Please compare \setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] with
\setupwhitespace[0pt plus 2ex] here:
\showframe
\setuphead[section][style={\switchtobodyfont[72pt]}]
\setupalign[height]
\setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] % desired result
Hi,
Please compare \setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] with
\setupwhitespace[0pt plus 2ex] here:
\showframe
\setuphead[section][style={\switchtobodyfont[72pt]}]
\setupalign[height]
\setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] % desired result
%\setupwhitespace[0pt plus 2ex] % "plus 2ex" is unused
for the single bar |.
Best regards: OK
On 11 May 2015, at 18:50, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Any hints about the missing \lfloor, \lceil with \big etc.?
hm, still missing?
No. They work
On 5/12/2015 8:12 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
While you are at the delimiters, could you please add also
\|
as an alias for \Vert? The command \| exists in plain TeX (and in many other
TeX packages used by mathematicians) as an alias for the double bar norm,
\Vert, or ||, while
On 5/11/2015 12:50 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/10/2015 4:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
$\left\langle x \right\rfloor$
they were not defined as pair (yet) ... done in next beta
As I said in the previous email, \langle ... \rfloot are not typically
one only in which case tex has to be tricked)
OK.
Any hints about the missing \lfloor, \lceil with \big etc.?
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Any hints about the missing \lfloor, \lceil with \big etc.?
hm, still missing?
No. They work with the latest beta.
Other missing delimiters:
\lmoustache, \rmoustache, \llbracket, \rrbracket, \llangle
these (the main issue one doesn't
pair but uses one only in which case tex has to be tricked)
OK.
Any hints about the missing \lfloor, \lceil with \big etc.?
hm, still missing?
Hans
-
Hans
or not.
one can pair anything fenced so also these (the main issue one doesn't
pair but uses one only in which case tex has to be tricked)
OK.
Any hints about the missing \lfloor, \lceil with \big etc.?
hm, still missing?
No. They work with the latest beta.
Thanks for the bugfix.
Aditya
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Any hints about the missing \lfloor, \lceil with \big etc.?
hm, still missing?
No. They work with the latest beta.
Other missing delimiters:
\lmoustache, \rmoustache, \llbracket, \rrbracket, \llangle, \rrangle,
\lgroup, \ulcorner, \urcorner
On Sun, 10 May 2015, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/10/2015 4:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
$\left\langle x \right\rfloor$
they were not defined as pair (yet) ... done in next beta
As I said in the previous email, \langle ... \rfloot are not typically
used together, so there is no need to add
Hi,
This is based on another question on TeX.SX
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/242256/323
Minimal example:
\starttext
\startlines
$\big\lfloor x \big\rfloor$ % No delimiters
$\Big\lfloor x \Big\rfloor$ % No delimiters
$\left\lfloor x \right\rfloor$ % Works
\stoplines
\stoptext
Any idea what
On 5/10/2015 4:06 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
$\left\langle x \right\rfloor$
they were not defined as pair (yet) ... done in next beta
(there is a special fences subsystem, also with some checking for
mismatch and so, needed for unattended processing as in mathml)
Hans
Mr Hagen, is it the expected behaviour?
\starttext
The delimiters are correctly displayed:
\startformula
\left\lfloor \frac{x}{y}\right\rfloor
\stopformula
The delimiters vanish:
\startformula
\Bigl\lfloor \frac{x}{y}\Bigr\rfloor
\stopformula
\stoptext
Maggyero
MWE:
\starttext
The delimiters are correctly displayed:
\startformula
\left\lfloor \frac{x}{y}\right\rfloor
\stopformula
The delimiters vanish:
\startformula
\Bigl\lfloor \frac{x}{y}\Bigr\rfloor
\stopformula
\stoptext
Maggyero
Dear NTG-ConTeXt members,
The math delimiters for floor and ceiling functions (\lfloor, \rfloor,
\lceil, \rceil) work with the automatic scaling commands (\left and \right)
but vanish with the manual scaling commands (\big, \Big, \bigg, \Bigg,
\bigl, \Bigl, \biggl, \Biggl, \bigr, \Bigr, \biggr
][after={\blank[samepage,big]}]
\starttext
\completecontent
\dorecurse{4}{\part{Part}
\chapter{Chapter}
\chapter{Chapter}}
\stoptext
Is this a real bug or am i missing something?
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
Dear list,
I don’t have a minimal sample (yet), but I have added the command above
to force part titles in contents to be with the next part title.
Well, the contents take five pages and two of them finish with a part title.
Am I missing something or is this a bug? And if it were a bug, would
On 6/5/2014 6:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I don’t have a minimal sample (yet), but I have added the command above
to force part titles in contents to be with the next part title.
Well, the contents take five pages and two of them finish with a part title.
Am I missing something
On 6/22/2013 10:45 PM, Sander Maijers wrote:
If I decide to use, for instance, Σ instead of \sum, this operator
is no longer stretched/scaling regardless of the sub/superscripts
specified tot it. Is it possible to keep stretching/scaling while using
Inicode characters for such operators?
This
If I decide to use, for instance, Σ instead of \sum, this operator
is no longer stretched/scaling regardless of the sub/superscripts
specified tot it. Is it possible to keep stretching/scaling while using
Inicode characters for such operators?
Hello,
I am trying to reproduce as closely as possible the large double quotes
in the attached file.
Though the actual glyph of the double quotes is not important for me (I
have
gone through the glyphs for CM without any success!), I would like to
keep the
double quotes large to attract
On 2013–02–11 Devendra Ghate wrote:
I am trying to reproduce as closely as possible the large double
quotes in the attached file.
Here are two solutions, one uses the delimitedtext mechanism. The
quotation marks are not printed within the quoted text, though.
The second solution using the
On 02/11/2013 11:29 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013--02--11 Devendra Ghate wrote:
I am trying to reproduce as closely as possible the large double
quotes in the attached file.
Here are two solutions, one uses the delimitedtext mechanism. The
quotation marks are not printed within the quoted
Am 11.02.2013 um 20:21 schrieb Devendra Ghate devendra.gh...@gmail.com:
There is an extra space before the right quote. So I added *\hskip-5pt*
before \symbol[MyRightQuote].
Add \removeunwatedspaces before \symbol to remove the space.
Wolfgang
On 1/23/2013 8:31 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
With the latest betas (version 2013.01.23 14:45 MKIV fmt: 2013.1.23)
\widehat and \widetilde
do not work anymore in mkiv (no matter the font): minimal example
begin bug-tilde.tex
\starttext
${\widetilde V}$
${\tilde u}$
If I want to say that dy/dx is calculated at z
then in latex I can write
\frac{dy}{dx}\Big|_z
The \Big is to scale | according to the size of the \frac.
I am using newmat and amsl modules that have supported
the native math mode commands till now. But context does
not recognise \Big.
What
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Devendra Ghate wrote:
If I want to say that dy/dx is calculated at z
then in latex I can write
\frac{dy}{dx}\Big|_z
The \Big is to scale | according to the size of the \frac.
I am using newmat and amsl modules that have supported
the native math mode commands till now
On 01/23/2013 09:27 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Devendra Ghate wrote:
If I want to say that dy/dx is calculated at z
then in latex I can write
\frac{dy}{dx}\Big|_z
The \Big is to scale | according to the size of the \frac.
I am using newmat and amsl modules that have
Hi Hans,
With the latest betas (version 2013.01.23 14:45 MKIV fmt: 2013.1.23)
\widehat and \widetilde
do not work anymore in mkiv (no matter the font): minimal example
begin bug-tilde.tex
\starttext
${\widetilde V}$
${\tilde u}$
${\widehat \phi}$
${\hat \alpha}$
\stoptext
with LuaTeX I get very large vertical distances. Much more then
\bigg(. Why is this?
MkIV has a different column mechanism controlled by gridsnapping and
\bigg is pretty big in that case
Anyhow, there is no grid=no in itemize, at least not now, so you can use:
\setupmixedcolumns
Hallo,
the following was ok with mkII:
% coding: utf-8
\def\B{\vphantom{\bigg)}}
\setupbodyfont[11pt,sans]
\starttext
\startitemize[a,columns,three,joinedup][grid=no,width=8mm,right=)]
\item $\B 5b\cdot (3a+4b-5c)$
\item $\B 3xy\cdot (2x-6y-xy)$
\item $\B (-0{,}5x)\cdot (3y-5x)$
\item $\B
between the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?
You can insert negative kerning with “\!”.
\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\!\left(#1\right)}
Thank you for the quick reply.
BTW: You redefine the already existing \P (expands
the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?
Getting these spaces is tricky; especially if you consider spaces before
and after the definition. Choose your pick:
\starttext
\startformula
A{\mathbf P}\left( ABC \right)B \quad
Am 25.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel:
BTW: You redefine the already existing \P (expands to ¶) command.
I should read the log to notice such problems. I guess I will use `\Pr`
then.
This isn’t better because \Pr is also a predefined command for math.
When you want to replace a
\right)}
Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?
Getting these spaces is tricky; especially if you consider spaces before
and after the definition. Choose your pick:
\starttext
\startformula
A{\mathbf
Dear ConTeXt folks,
to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
argument, I defined the following command.
\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I
( is a little big in
my opinion. Is that correct or should/can I fix that somehow?
You can insert negative kerning with “\!”.
\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\!\left(#1\right)}
BTW: You redefine the already existing \P (expands to ¶) command.
Wolfgang
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
to markup the probability measure and the parenthesis around the
argument, I defined the following command.
\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
Unfortunately the space between the P and the left ( is a little big
Hi,
I'm a new user of context. I'm working with \framed and I have a
problem when I try to fit a big text in it :-(. The system cuts the
text and it doesn't display in the next page. I read the manual but I
can not find an argument of framed that can do this job.
An example of my code
Am 04.03.2011 um 21:47 schrieb Milton Galo Patricio Inostroza Aguilera:
Hi,
I'm a new user of context. I'm working with \framed and I have a
problem when I try to fit a big text in it :-(. The system cuts the
text and it doesn't display in the next page. I read the manual but I
can
2011/3/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Use textbackground.
\definetextbackground
[myframe]
[location=paragraph,
framecolor=black,
background=]
\starttext
\startmyframe
\dorecurse{20}{\input knuth\par}
\stopmyframe
\stoptext
thanks! it works like a charm
{\@@dobig{1.080}}
% \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
% \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
% \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
% \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
I think the second set of parameters( the commented one) is correct.
or \big,\bigg, etc will produce huge delimiters...
Yue Wang
\big \bigg \Big and \Bigg has no effect in Mkiv with opentype math fonts.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl
On 8-4-2010 7:40, Mikael Persson wrote:
Ok Hans, with the beta from yesterday the absolute values change size,
but there are some problems still:
1) The absolute value bars are not just straight lines when using
\big and friends, but som kind of line that is thicker in the middle.
(zoom i
) The absolute value bars are not just straight lines when using
\big and friends, but som kind of line that is thicker in the middle.
(zoom i on attached pdf)
this is because lm has no such characters so they are made from the smaller
ones (extensible characters)
in traditional lm this can go
On 8-4-2010 10:37, Mikael Persson wrote:
Thanks for you answer and explanation. Is there a reason why you do
not add \| to get double bars? This is the way it is done in LaTeX
(OK, not really an argument). I'm just curious.
we never had \| in mkii and in mkiv it's equivalent to | (just like
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Mikael Persson mic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6-4-2010 10:30, Mikael Persson wrote:
Dear list,
I have problems with \big, \bigl, \Bigl, ...
%% Example
\def\foo#1{\type{#1}: #1}
\starttext
\foo
Dear list,
I have problems with \big, \bigl, \Bigl, ...
%% Example
\def\foo#1{\type{#1}: #1}
\starttext
\foo{$|x|^n$} % as expected.
\foo{$\bigl|x^n\bigr|$} % expect bigger bars
\foo{$\big|x^n\big|$} % expect bigger bars
\foo{$\Bigl|x^n\Bigr|$} % too small again (but bigger than \big)
\foo
On 6-4-2010 10:30, Mikael Persson wrote:
Dear list,
I have problems with \big, \bigl, \Bigl, ...
%% Example
\def\foo#1{\type{#1}: #1}
\starttext
\foo{$|x|^n$} % as expected.
\foo{$\bigl|x^n\bigr|$} % expect bigger bars
\foo{$\big|x^n\big|$} % expect bigger bars
\foo{$\Bigl|x^n\Bigr
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6-4-2010 10:30, Mikael Persson wrote:
Dear list,
I have problems with \big, \bigl, \Bigl, ...
%% Example
\def\foo#1{\type{#1}: #1}
\starttext
\foo{$|x|^n$} % as expected.
\foo{$\bigl|x^n\bigr|$} % expect bigger bars
Am 15.12.2009 um 14:18 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Hi,
Can I setup something bigger then big?
\setupinterlinespace[big]
I'd like to have more spacing. How to achieve this?
\setupinterlinespace[2]
Wolfgang
Thank you, Luigi, for excellent snippet! )
\unprotect
%%big 1.5
%%medium 1.25
%%small 1.0
%%
%%bbig 1.75
\def\v!bbig{bbig}
\long\def\OneandSevthirdofthreearguments #1#2#3{1.75}
\letvalu...@av@\v!bbig }\OneandSevthirdofthreearguments
%%Big 2.0
\def\v!Big{Big}
\long\def
Hi,
Can I setup something bigger then big?
\setupinterlinespace[big]
I'd like to have more spacing. How to achieve this?
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
Hi Vyatcheslav
you can assign your own value to this command.
e.g.
\setupbodyfont[Myfont,9pt]\setupinterlinespace[11pt]
Willi
On Dec 15, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hi,
Can I setup something bigger then big?
\setupinterlinespace[big]
I'd like to have more spacing. How
Am 15.12.2009 um 14:18 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Hi,
Can I setup something bigger then big?
\setupinterlinespace[big]
I'd like to have more spacing. How to achieve this?
\setupinterlinespace[line=...]
Wolfgang
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
yatskov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can I setup something bigger then big?
\setupinterlinespace[big]
I'd like to have more spacing. How to achieve this?
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
Hello,
I found a bug (?) with \setupfloat[figure][indentnext=yes]
If I do
Some Text
\placefigure[middle]{}{...}
Some Text
then it's ok, but if
Some Text
\placefigure[inner]{}{...}
Some Text
then the next paragraph is NOT indented.
It looks ugly, please, fix
I want to create a pdf-document which has severall frames in which
user supplied data has to be put. I have two questions about this:
- How can I use parameters to fill the boxes?
- When one or more of the supplied texts does not fit its frame the
pdf document is 'corrupt'. How can I see that at
@space $
}}
\...@mt@defaultbigm #1-\puremathcomm {rel}{\big {#1}
}
l.3 \bigm|
_a.
?
Mojca
___
If your
$
\@@dobig ...o #1\bodyfontsize {}\right @space $
}}
\...@mt@defaultbigm #1-\puremathcomm {rel}{\big {#1}
}
l.3 \bigm|
_a.
?
MKII?
This doesn't work correctly in MKIV, but gives
Hello,
I have heads typed in capital letters, but I want first letters of each
word to be capitalized and the rest small.
For example, I have
\faculty{ФАКУЛЬТЕТ АЕРОКОСМІЧНИХ СИСТЕМ УПРАВЛІННЯ}
but actually I need the result that would be produced by
\faculty{Факультет Аерокосмічних Систем
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello,
I have heads typed in capital letters, but I want first letters of each
word to be capitalized and the rest small.
For example, I have
\faculty{ФАКУЛЬТЕТ АЕРОКОСМІЧНИХ СИСТЕМ УПРАВЛІННЯ}
but actually I need the result that would be produced by
I have heads typed in capital letters, but I want first letters of each
word to be capitalized and the rest small.
For example, I have
\faculty{BIG HEAD}
but actually I need the result that would be produced by
\faculty{Big Head}
I have played a lot with \Word
Am 30.03.2009 um 17:31 schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Hello,
I have heads typed in capital letters, but I want first letters of
each word to be capitalized and the rest small.
Till Hans fix \Word(s) you could use this:
\setuphead[faculty][deeptextcommand=\Words\lowercase]
Wolfgang
Hello,
With the last version, there are no more spaces in the output of the
following example file:
\setupbodyfont[18pt] % this comes from a module
\usetypescript[palatino]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino] % this is a project specific configuration
\starttext
bla bla bla
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
With the last version, there are no more spaces in the output of the
following example file:
\setupbodyfont[18pt] % this comes from a module
\usetypescript[palatino]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino] % this is a project specific configuration
\starttext
bla bla bla
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Diego Depaoli wrote:
Hi all,
before start spend my time, can Context handle 6 (or 8) columns on a
70X100 cm papersize?
yes, and if it's about a poster, just use columnsets then
many thanks, it works
However I get a weird
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo